Talk:Apollo 16/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 01:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

This is an excellent article, very close to GA status. I have just a couple of minor concerns that need to be addressed before I pass the review:

• Apolune and Perilune: According to Apsis, the forms Apocynthion and Pericynthion were preferred during the Apollo program. Perhaps we should use those instead?

 Done

• In the Lunar Surface section, a direct quote from geologist Don Wilhelms needs an immediate citation.

 Done

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.

Thanks. –Grondemar 06:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

I've addressed both of your concerns. Thanks very much for your review. Tyrol5 [Talk] 14:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for addressing my concerns; I can now pass this good article nomination. Congratulations! –Grondemar 21:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)