Talk:Apology (act)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apology (act) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology C‑class High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kingap21. Peer reviewers: Chelsea.nakayama.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"I apologise for you loss" is the formula currently used by UK banks and other corporate entities in addressing bereaved clients on the phone. It sounds absurd, since no blame attaches to the agent and then, mildly offensive as the undermining of a courtesy is of itself discourteous. However automatic, the subverted: "I am sorry for your loss" is naturally sympathetic. To apply common avoidance of a saying "sorry" with an "I apologise," as is so often the case, carries with it a burden of blame, guilt, defensiveness and then aggression. 2A00:23C7:A31F:AA00:B942:7F04:C51:EBCC (talk) 07:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Previous version said the opposite of what the cited source said...

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"And that’s why the most successful apologies in her research begin by focusing on the victim, or apologizee; not the apologizer.

CERULO: Where you would start out by talking about your victim, and talk very little about yourself or your own justifications, and end your apology by talking about how sorry you were. And if possible, stating that you’d make some restitution. Those types of apologies were the most effective."

This means the most effective apologies focus on the victim and how they felt, not ineffective ones!

The relevant change was made today, 2 October 2024. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 06:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic