GA fail
editWikipedia is not a reliable source!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There are a few citation tags in the article which need to be taken care of. Also, the majority of the article is fragmented and needs to be unified into cohesive paragraphs. I'd strongly recommend taking this to WP:LOCE to get the prose fixed before renominating. Wrad (talk) 01:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- "There are a few citation tags...which need to be taken care of"?! There are only two of them! 2 only! is that a reason to fail???
- I do not think WP:LOCE is needed...The article is well written compared to the level of articles you might expect to find there....
- Also, This is GA, and not FA. This is why, even if you pass an article, you use a template to indicate what areas of the articles need improving.
- I respect your decision, but I am taking this to GAR. Cheers! Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 14:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's not well-written. It's not well-referenced. And I don't have to use a template. I just have to compare it to the criteria, which I did. It's not going to pass without some major changes, GAR or no GAR. Wrad (talk) 15:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)