Talk:Appleby Magna

Untitled

Nice page - I have added some refs although I didnt know where the last three refs referred to in the text. There was no census in 1801 ... is this 1901? Victuallers 15:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1801 census may be correct: Census Act 1800. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 17:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Link to St Michael & All Angels Parish Registers added to External Links. Eebdsirhc (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Appleby Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922095505/http://www.applebymagna.org.uk/appleby_history/in_focus2_Romans.htm to http://www.applebymagna.org.uk/appleby_history/in_focus2_romans.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061013024518/http://www.applebymagna.org.uk/appleby_history/enclosures.htm to http://www.applebymagna.org.uk/appleby_history/enclosures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Merge school

I have suggested that Sir John Moore Church of England Primary School should be merged here as a non-notable primary which doesn't pass WP:GNG, as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Any comments appreciated. CalzGuy (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Oppose This is no run-of-the-mill school. Its age and architectural qualities both make it notable. What other primary school has received six million pounds from a heritage fund? S a g a C i t y (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Oppose As a former grammar school (and more than 300 years old) this is notable enough for a separate article.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 18:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Closed, given clear uncontested arguments not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Resolved