Talk:April 2013 Bachu unrest

Disputed

This article is not factually accurate. Police officers and social workers did not clash with each other. In addition, sources are not calling this an ethnic clash. Some sources, like the BBC, mention ethnicity, but nothing calls this an ethnic clash directly. The term terrorism has been used, but only by the Chinese government. This was a clash, but it was a clash between a group of people of an unnamed ethnicity and the authorities. Ryan Vesey 15:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Article merger reverted

The article has recently been merged into Xinjiang conflict, but without any discussion. I revert it until an official discussion is made.Greyshark09 (talk) 15:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

@Greyshark09: What is suppose to be the scope of this article? All Xinjaing clashes in 2013, or just the one in April? The April and the June clashes are completely separate events, so we shouldn't put the two events in the same article. If it's just about the clashes in April, I say we change the title to April 2013 Xinjaing unrest or 2013 Selibuya unrest and remove the content concerning the June events.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

@FutureTrillionaire: Sounds good, i moved to "April 2013 Xinjiang unrest" and will create another article on June events.Greyshark09 (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Theres not need for a separate stuf when the article refer to the same stem root of conflict in the same year justm onths apaert. Separate sub-sections (As in other articles) would suffice. The sources all point to the historical ethnic conflict so there is not much difference.(Lihaas (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)).

Deletion proposal by Stifle

Well, i see the article is proposed for deletion by User:Stifle. Meanwhile, i merged here the 2013 Xinjiang ethnic clashes, which had been previously an orphan article, obviously about the same topic. I must mention that taking notability of this article into test, the April 2013 Bachu unrest is mentioned also in May newspapers ([1], [2]) and July newspapers ([3], [4]), thus giving it extra-weight than just news. We have to also consider the high number of casualties and the multi-national coverage.Greyshark09 (talk) 12:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on April 2013 Bachu unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150705023655/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking_news_detail.asp?id=38000&icid=a&d_str= to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking_news_detail.asp?id=38000&icid=a&d_str=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)