Talk:AquaBounty Technologies
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 March 2011. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CSD, AfD
editAquaBounty technologies has been in the new continuously over the last few months because of the ongoing public debate and approval process regarding the AquaBounty transgenic Salmon product. I want to create a good NPOV stub, so that people who keep reffering to the company in public online debates have a place to refer to get vetted information. Infoeco (talk) 14:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi there! I changed it from a speedy delete to an Article listed for Deletion. You can go use the link on the main article page to see the consensus and also make comments. This will give you some time to flesh out this article. It might not pass, or it might. At this point I am not involved with its fate. Thanks! Golgofrinchian (talk) 14:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on AquaBounty Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628022809/http://www.aquabounty.com/company/company-history-292.aspx to http://www.aquabounty.com/company/company-history-292.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121121155/http://fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/18699/Delays_put_question_mark_over_GM_salmon_as_development_company_receives_bid.html to http://www.fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/18699/Delays_put_question_mark_over_GM_salmon_as_development_company_receives_bid.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Structure of the Article
editI would suggest to put the History subsection further on top of the page rather than at the bottom. Right now it is on the bottom, with two other entries (subchapters) on top; I think it would make more sense to arrange History closer to the top in general. For instance, I specifically came to the article because I wanted to read up on the history specifically, in regards to fish, so this is the most relevant part for me. The other parts are good to know as well, but history is where my interest was when coming to the article (this is tied to how much fish are produced globally in "aqua-farms", so not solely confined to the company as-such). 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 13:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. History is normally at the top, at the bottom is certainly unusual. Done: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AquaBounty_Technologies&diff=1036460802&oldid=1035844907 Invasive Spices (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)