This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
File:Aquad1.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Aquad1.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Aquad1.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC) |
This article appears to be written like an advertisement
editAquad is a software to analyze qualitative data. It is a CAQDAS. The author is a university professor and not a company. The information is objective. What could we say about a software?
1 Author 2 Description 3 Possibilities 3.1 Presentation of data 3.2 Situation of data 3.3 Comparison of cases/files by Boolean analysis 4 Versions
I think that softwares - as proprietary as free ones - should have articles. I am only user. I have tried to describe it without valuations nor inviting to use or to buy it. I think that it is an objective approach. Tell me which contents should be changed. --Tfeliz (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Changes
editSome changes were included to improve this article: - Extension of several parts with further information. - Addition of external links with examples of Aquad use. Please: consider to eliminate the advertisement consideration. --Tfeliz (talk) 22:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Free software?
editThis and the Aquad website claim that the software is FLOSS, available under the GPL license; however the source code does not seem to be available. It might be an omission or a technical problem (the website appears in poor shape, whole forum is 404), but is this open? --Remram44 (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- As you can check in the website, the software is totally free. Best regards. Tiberio Feliz 08:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)