Talk:Aquarium fish clubs

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

this page

edit

So what do people think about this page???? Is it usefull?

Layout of the page is a bit weird right now... it covers types of clubs, but then does not categorize any of the clubs, so describing the types of clubs seems to be a bit useless under the current layout. Magnus 01:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Inclusion? Should this article be deleted?

edit

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a list of links/addresses etc. I'm really not sure what to do with this article. If it is going to be included in Wikipedia it's got to be about what an "aquarium fish society etc" is - not where to contact one. Perhaps we could re-write this article as an encyclopedia article and ask all the clubs to move their information to the Open Directory Project? MidgleyDJ 06:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nice work! MidgleyDJ 08:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oldest clubs

edit

I've reverted a clumsily-made IP edit here: [1], but I think it needs to be noted that there may, perhaps, be an older still-active club in Germany. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aquarium fish clubs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply