This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A lot of this article currently relies on primary sources, especially this one in the beginning. The one secondary source is a review, but probably a lot of this could be sourced to some books: there are a lot of results in Google Books for "aquasome," and it appears to be written on (if only by scientific publishers). At least some of them are put out by vanity publishers, but for anyone trying to replace some of the primary sources, The Era of Nanotechnology seems like a decent place to start. The other issue is whether a lot of these sources are written by people actively researching aquasomes, and whether that could be a conflict of interest, but that's probably minor in comparison to having some secondary sources. Mrfoogles (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
