Talk:Arab conquest of Egypt/Archives/ 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Arab conquest of Egypt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The reference quoted couldn't be traced
Under the heading "Siege of Babylon", the paragraph bears a citation 21 to Alfred Butler's book, pages 254-255. Upon referring to the book, couldn't trace the contents/suggestions of paragraph. Can someone help, please. 02:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbasinaseem (talk • contribs)
- I also had problems getting quotations from "The Great Arab Conquests". It seems Google's OCR is iffy. I can't find a scanned copy of the book, and retrieving a physical copy is not reasonable. I coped by removing quotations that seem off (grammatical errors, and where there are no closing quotes) and inserting their meanings. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 17:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Request for the inclusion of information on Sunnis and Shias
The article talks repeatedly about invading Muslims. Would these be Sunni Muslims or Shia Muslims or something else? Or does it vary from one invasion to the next? I ask because of renewed warfare between Sunni Islamists and Shias in various countries. I understand that these days most Muslim Egyptians are Sunni, but I don't know how that came about, and I'd like this article to clarify. I think the information I'm requesting is important because so very many people don't bother to distinguish, which interferes with a clear understanding of what's going on in so many civil wars these days. Page Notes (talk) 04:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Muslim conquest of Egypt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5wTrnwFCI?url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04597c.htm to http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04597c.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Taxation under Muslim rul
The substance here is wrong -- the "poll tax" instituted by the Arabs was probably the Jizya, applied to "dhimmi", that is non-Muslims, and was specific to Islam. The overall tax burden probably was lighter than under the East Romans (Byzantines), since they were still paying for the wars, but they did not institute taxes on "non-Christians". The point of the section, if there is to be one, should be that the overall tax burden was lessened under the new Arab conquerors, and that may have affected the population's view of their new rulers. Soft soaping the Jizya by erroneously saying it was not a new thing ends up mangling the section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sychonic (talk • contribs) 11:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)