Talk:Arbitral tribunal
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Comments
editMy recommendation is to move the section "Hearing" and "Procedure" over to the Arbitration page, and create the same for International Arbitration and any other arbitration pages that may come into existence since the manner of conducting proceedings and deciding evidentiary issues varies so widely, and descriptions of these variations would be a useful reference. McIlwrath 09:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'd suggest copying rather than moving, but other than that the proposal seems sound to me. --Legis (talk - [[Special:Contributions/Legisa word used in construction with and preceding certain forms of other verbs, as infinitives or participles, to express distinctions of tense, aspect, mood, etc.,
contributions]]) 14:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
editMy recommendation is to move the section "Hearing" and "Procedure" over to the Arbitration page, and create the same for International Arbitration and any other arbitration pages that may come into existence since the manner of conducting proceedings and deciding evidentiary issues varies so widely, and descriptions of these variations would be a useful reference. McIlwrath 09:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'd suggest copying rather than moving, but other than that the proposal seems sound to me. --Legis (talk - [[Special:Contributions/Legisa word used in construction with and preceding certain forms of other verbs, as infinitives or participles, to express distinctions of tense, aspect, mood, etc.,
contributions]]) 14:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Description
editThis article has the absolute crappiest explanation of a Arbitral tribunal! Give a fucking idea you lazy assholes! Person who doesn't like the article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghadden (talk • contribs) 23:37, 21 February 2007.
how can it not contain the London Maritime Arbitrators Association??? Pouloudi (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Powers of an Arbitrator
editDoes an arbiter have the same powers as an appointed judge? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.26.190.173 (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Arbitral tribunal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509123538/http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-conc/ml-conc-e.pdf to http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-conc/ml-conc-e.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130510215757/http://tribunalarbitral.pt to http://tribunalarbitral.pt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Arbitral tribunal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110204063837/http://www.cnarb.com/ to http://www.cnarb.com/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://tribunalarbitral.pt/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)