This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
The "logo" is already visable in the infobox image, which also shows the rest of the arch. The article is not large enough for a gallery or even a second image, especially one that is superfluous. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 14:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, and I disagree. Many artwork articles have images which focus on a part of the artwork, and the close-up of the logo's placement, linked above, works well. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply