Talk:Archaeological looting in Iraq

Iraq High‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Archaeology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Culture / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Crime and Criminal Biography High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 9 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

This article, begun on 9 March 2006, remains very much so a work in progress. I have no illusions that it is complete or properly written (e.g. NPOV), and no intentions of leaving it as is. Please feel free to edit my work or add to it, but please keep in mind that I intend to work on it further within the next few days and to expand and improve it greatly. Thank you. LordAmeth 18:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also, as this is an ongoing problem, easily one of the worst places for archaeological looting in the world, I am leaving the current event tag on it. I have not heard anything about the Iraqi government, American military, or other organizations making significant steps to curb the activity, and as far as I am aware, pieces continued to be looted at an extraordinary rate. If anyone knows differently, please simply provide a reference source, and add the information to the article itself, describing how and when the looting problem was reduced or ended. LordAmeth 03:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have tagged the article with unsourced and NPOV. There is not a single source cited in this article, and it contains POV statements. Crockspot 17:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you looked at the reference section, you would see the source I cited. All the information in this short stub of an article comes from that source. If there is anything in particular that you find to be of a non-neutral POV, other than the general point of view of being against thievery and other criminal acts, please let me know and I shall change it. There is no need for this to be a controversial article. LordAmeth 22:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added a few more sources that refer specifically to the continued looting of Iraq, one of whom is a Marine colonel who is trying to retrieve the artifacts stolen in April, 2003 but also is concerned about the continued looting outside of Baghdad... Additionally, there is an article included by a Columbia University archeologist Zainab Bahrani of the continued looting as well as articles from the Global Heritage Fund... Stevenmitchell 02:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

'Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, archaeological looting has become a minor problem.' Then why does it merit an article? Smacks of US mitigation propaganda. Beingsshepherd (talk) 04:08, 20 February 2013 (UTC)BeingsshepherdReply

When I came across this article, I tried to fix typos and improve readability, rephrasing and putting in paragraph breaks. It mostly appears to be a long summary of one book and the author's name was incorrect in 80 references. I am not sure that this page is really worthwhile. SuW (talk) 23:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

At the end of the section "Protection of museums under Ba'athist Iraq" there is the sentence "As 2002 came to an end the media and government were only broadcasting the good done by the troops in not destroying cultural heritage themselves but not on the looting done by people in Iraq and the Americans duty to protect the antiquities.[24]" This sentence is incorrect. There were not any American troops in Iraq in 2002, however there were American troops in Iraq in 2003. I am not in a position to determine if that is a typo or an unreliable source, but felt the error should be noted and corrected by a user who is in a position to do so. --Guest 20:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.9.90.197 (talk)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archaeological looting in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: HA 100-300

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Adillon243 (article contribs).

Add topic