Talk:Archaeology of Igbo-Ukwu/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 15:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I did a brief copy-edit for some simple errors, this shouldn't bias my review. The prose could be more polished, but is acceptable. No copyvios.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References are formatted properly and consistently. All content is verifiable and adequately cited. Offline sources accepted AGF.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Focused, yet provides key context and information.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The praise directed toward the Igbo-Ukwu culture in the article mirrors that found in the sources cited. It presents alternative views in a fair, unbiased manner.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Very stable.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are public domain in the US, and, as this is an article on the archaeology of a culture, are vital to the topic at hand.--¿3family6 _contribs 16:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

7. Overall: The prose could use some polishing, but it is acceptable. Overall, a good article. The subject is very important, and I would highly recommend bringing this article up to featured status. It certainly deserves more attention.--¿3family6 _contribs 17:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail: