Talk:Archibald Spencer

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Archibald Spencer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

• Add a comma after "as a businessman".

•  Done

• What is the purpose of the Edinburgh image?

•  Done Removed.

• "Edinburgh, Scotland, Adam" - split these sentences

•  Done

• "and a male midwife and" - repetitive use of "and"

•  Done

• Boston Evening Post → Boston Evening-Post

•  Done

• Wikilink The Boston Weekly Post-Boy

•  Done

• the Boston Weekly Post-Boy →The Boston Weekly Post-Boy

•  Done

• the Pennsylvania Gazette → The Pennsylvania Gazette

•  Done

• "metallic fragments move" → "metallic fragments to move"

•  Done

• Add a comma after "after that".

•  Done

• Can #Religion be merged with #Death as #Personal_life_and_death?

•  Done

• @Some Dude From North Carolina: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)