Talk:Ardagh Hoard

Ireland High‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts Low‑importance

	Ardagh Hoard is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Older posts

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Any way to get this image of the Ardagh Chalice into Wikipedia? Wetman 04:59, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Who ever said it was the Cauldron of Rebirth? Where did that come from? That's bull. MaryJones

Author Maurice Cotterell said he is positive that the Celtic cup known s the Ardagh Chalice (kept in the National Museum of Ireland in Dublin) is the Holy Grail and outlined how it was buried with Joseph of Arimathaea and then discovered by King Arthur in the 5th century. It was Arthur who engraved the names of the 12 disciples on it along with two dragons, claimed Cotterell, who noted the same dragon marks are carved into the Amazing Lid of Palenque from the resting place of Lord Pacal of the Maya (whom he believes to be the reincarnation of Jesus).

Arthur broke the code of the Tara Brooch, a sister artifact to the Chalice, which led to his famed pulling of the sword and subsequent realization that he'd found the Holy Grail, Cotterell explained.

mauricecotterell.com

Books

Jesus, King Arthur, and the Journey of the Grail

The Mayan Prophecies: Unlocking the Secrets of a Lost Civilization

The Terracotta Warriors

!!!! Cotterell's work is, at best, parahistorical. The Ardagh Chalice is a medieval Irish liturgical vessel, not the Holy Grail. Even if we accept that the historical Jesus had a Last Supper as described in the gospels, and if we accept that the cup used was then given to Joseph of Arimathea (a suggestion only found in high medieval literature), then you have to admit the design of the Ardagh Chalice is of the La Tène revival, not first century Palestine.

Even if we admit that Arthur existed (something debatable, but I'll play along), the chalice postdates him. And there is no evidence whatsoever that the chalice is at all related to the Tara Brooch, nor that Arthur would have ever come across these items.

This is really ridiculous. MaryJones 16:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added a citation needed tag on the Cauldron bit, but I honestly think it should be deleted. Flowerpotman 01:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ardagh Hoard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic