Talk:Ardress House

National Trust paid pilot

This draft was started as part of a paid pilot for the National Trust, for further details on the pilot, please see. I've posted aboout this draft at WikiProject Northern Ireland, and there has been discussion in terms of how to go through AfC on my talk page. Thank you very much Lajmmoore (talk) 12:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Note for AfC reviewer

This page has been drafted as part of a paid pilot for the National Trust. If the reviewer approves the page, please would you be able to delete the existing redirect? This advice was given in this conversation. Many thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 10:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the dining room at Ardress House has no internal doors and can only be reached using an external entrance? Source: Greeves, Lydia (2008-09-30). Houses of the National Trust. Pavilion Books. pp. 20–21.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Reina Scully
  • Comment: I previously nominated Stowe Gardens for a DYK, but it turned out to be ineligible. I hope I can transfer my Reina Scully review here?

Also, I don't think the source is available offline, but I can send the PDF to a reviewer.

Also also, for full disclosure, this page was started as part of a paid pilot funded by the National Trust, please see my user page for further details. Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 12:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC).

Pleased to pick this up. KJP1 (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Review

• I think it is NEW enough, due to expansion, Y;
• It is LONG enough, Y;
• It is WITHIN POLICY, Y;
• The HOOK looks fine, both for FORMAT and CONTENT.

• May I suggest:

ALT0a: ... that you need to go outside to eat at Ardress House?

Also, I don't believe QPQ credit is transferable. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks RoySmith, ALT0a sounds fine to me. In terms of the QPQ, this is the previous nomination. I did look through the rules, but can't see anything about donation/movement of QPQs -although I know editors have donated their 'extras' to other editors in the past. I assumed (in the absence of guidance that I could see) that since that previous nomination was unsuccessful, that freed up the review for me to donate to myself. I think it would be useful to have this clarified in the DYK rules for the future (or if I have missed something, please let me know). I've got quite a busy week this week, but will get to a new review on Friday. Many thanks for the discussion too, it's so interesting to talk about these points. Lajmmoore (talk) 19:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

• I'll leave the QPQ question to somebody better versed in DKY-fu than I am. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Happy to pick up this review. And I happen to have the book sourced so no pdf required. KJP1 (talk) 05:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)