Talk:Ares IV (Star Trek)

Latest comment: 17 years ago by GW Simulations in topic Requested moves

Requested moves

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Closing after 6 days, 11-0 in favour of move. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 23:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ares IV (launch vehicle) is about a real proposal for a rocket, which has a good chance of being built. This article is about a ficticious spaceship from the Star Trek universe. I would say that the rocket proposal is more notable, and therefore it should have the name Ares IV, and this page should be moved elsewhere, with a disambiguation link on the new Ares IV page linking to it. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 12:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes

edit
  1. Nominate and Support --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 12:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support per nom. PC78 14:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support. Grant 16:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  4. Support per nom. GassyGuy 20:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  5. Support per nom.Bchan 21:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  6. Support because reality is more important than fiction. Rdl381 00:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  7. Support I don't even think the Star Trek ship is notable enough to warrant the page by itself. It should be merged into a greater article about Trek ships. 205.157.110.11 01:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  8. Support 75.14.58.185 01:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  9. Support -- Reality should always trump fiction. --Altanar 01:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  10. Support, WP:SNOW? --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 00:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
  11. Support and delete the Star Trek page or merge it into something else. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 06:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Survey - Oppose votes

edit

Discussion

edit
Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.