Talk:Argentine Sea

Cleanup message

Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.

Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 13:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Scotia Sea

Is this the same thing as the Scotia Sea (as that article suggests)? If so, there should be a merger.-86.134.12.250

Scotia Sea doesn't reach the Rio de la Plata. It might be contained in the Argentine Sea, but they are not equivalent. --Mariano(t/c) 02:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Map requested

If anyone is capable of making a map to show the location of this sea relative to its nearest landforms (i.e., Argentina et al.) and larger bodies of water (i.e., the Atlantic et al.), it would be much appreciated! Robert K S (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The current map is bogus. Can we get a new one showing the generally accepted 150 meter depth line? Hcobb (talk) 21:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Map showing a clear line WAY below the 150 meter depth limit halfway between Argentina and the Falklands.

http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/explore/ocean448scosea_002.gif

Case closed. Hcobb (talk) 15:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Argentine sea is not linked to a particular depth, but to the continental shelf. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_shelf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.126.151.137 (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Does it exist?

Does this sea even exist or has someone just made it up? Is it the point of Wikipedia to be making up new things? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.105.91 (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

not the place for this in the lead ....

See: The Antarctic Master Directory for research regarding the location and biodiversity in the Argentine Sea. Link: http://gcmd.nasa.gov/KeywordSearch/Metadata.do?Portal=amd&KeywordPath=%5BKeyword%3D'fish'%5D&OrigMetadataNode=GCMD&EntryId=scarmarbin_cnp-peces&MetadataView=Full&MetadataType=0&lbnode=mdlb5 - I removed this and put it here. Not sure what the purpose of it is, but we don't "link" this way in Wiki. For a sea that doesn't exist except in the political attitudes of some Argentine nationalists, I propose this article is just a POV fork and should be deleted. HammerFilmFan (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

The UK Falkland Islands claim boundary starts from the midpoint between Argentina and the Islands to the West

The claim boundary doesn't start from the midpoint, as the image in the linked reference shows. The midpoint is the hyphened line whereas the boundary is the green/blue EEZ division. Dab14763 (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Argentine Sea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121004233052/http://www.redargentina.com/mipais/regiones/mar/ to http://www.redargentina.com/mipais/regiones/mar/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105114838/http://www.fvsa.org.ar/situacionambiental/Mar%20Argentino.pdf to http://www.fvsa.org.ar/situacionambiental/Mar%20Argentino.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)