Talk:Argentine irredentism

Requested move

I am Argentine and I never heard of something like the 'Greater Argentina'. Frankly, the first time I came upon this page I though that the matter was the Argentine nationalist claims over the old territories of the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata, which makes more sense for the article's title. My proposal is to rename the page "Argentine irredentism", which decribes more accurately the subject. Any comments?.--Darius (talk) 21:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for a delay in my response, as I research into the subject the move seems more and more proper, I had been mostly unaware of the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata when I wrote this article, perhaps this page could be moved to "Argentine irredentism" as suggested and another article about irridentist feelings over Bolivia and Paraguay could in time be written in place of the redirect created from the move, I will move the page shortly. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 02:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Y Done! – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 02:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!. The issue of irredentist feelings over the old viceroyalty is actually an academic matter raised by nationalist historians, not an official policy. The Argentine government dropped any claim by the end of the XIX century. Best regards.--Darius (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Antarctica?

I don't think that the claims on Antarctica belong here. It is not a case of a country claiming sovereignty over some other's country territory: right now, Antarctica does not "belong" to anyone, not Argentina, but neither Chile or Britain. Cambalachero (talk) 19:30, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Basically agree, We could speak in equal terms about "Chilean irredentism" or even "British irredentism" over Antarctica, since it is in practice a case of res nullius.--Darius (talk) 22:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Argentine irredentism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050914081244/http://www.comnap.aq:80/comnap/comnap.nsf/P/CountryByISO/AR/?Open to http://www.comnap.aq/comnap/comnap.nsf/P/CountryByISO/AR/?Open

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Argentine irredentism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040617152239/http://www.senado.gov.ar/web/interes/constitucion/cuerpo1.php to http://www.senado.gov.ar/web/interes/constitucion/cuerpo1.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604215413/http://www.senado.gov.ar/web/interes/constitucion/english.php to http://www.senado.gov.ar/web/interes/constitucion/english.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100626055834/http://www.patagoniaincognita.com/ to http://www.patagoniaincognita.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927040809/http://www.dna.gov.ar/DIVULGAC/BASES2.HTM to http://www.dna.gov.ar/DIVULGAC/BASES2.HTM
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080117220618/http://www.cpel.uba.ar/filargenta/correo/anta0047.htm to http://www.cpel.uba.ar/filargenta/correo/anta0047.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Historical irredentism

Only one mention of Tarija and no mention of Argentina claims in the Chaco. Don't Argentina irrendentists also usually claim Chile and Banda Oriental? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.27.120 (talk) 12:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Irredentism? Really?

Irredentism and expansionism are closely related but distinctly different concepts. It is difficult to see how much, if not all, of Argentina's claims in the South Atlantic and Antartica can reasonably be described as irrendist. It is important to remember that states involved in an expansionist policy will often try to justify their actions by using less objectionable irredentist terminology. Are we not falling into the trap set by the expansionist Argentine state when we describe Argentina's claims as irredentism when all they really are is good old-fashioned expansionism? Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Great Argentina?

See today's edits. 2x2leax, why have you added 'Great Argentina'? Grammatically, it cannot be an alternative to irridentism: one is a concrete noun while the other is a concept, an abstract noun - you cannot compare the two. In any case, they mean different things, as in the above section. Also, where are your sources? I have never heard of 'Great Argentina'. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)