This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:03, November 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Stubby, and stylistic problems, just like far too many other articles on Sengoku samurai. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy these articles exist, and to whichever editor is reading this and taking this personally, please don't. I have nothing against you personally - I am simply trying to help get the quality & breadth of Japanese coverage on Wikipedia to a higher level, and I can't do it alone. In any case, you can start with the introduction. It begins with "Arima Haruzumi. Japanese feudal lord in the Sengoku era." Neither of those are sentences. Add a verb, "to be", and it becomes a beautiful introductory sentence: "Arima Haruzumi was a Japanese feudal lord in the Sengoku era." It's all about the small stylistic changes. LordAmeth22:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply