Talk:Arizona State Route 347/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Racepacket in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 03:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply


Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. links or invalid external links.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    "where the a farm appears" - delete "the"
      Done. --PCB 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    "about 33,000 vehicles used the route on an average day." - can you say at what point on the route?
      Done --PCB 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    What about adding Harrah's casino to the route description?
    What evidence do you have of this? Harrah's casino seems to be in San Diego. --PCB 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
      Done --PCB 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Official website and map shows address as 15406 Maricopa Road, Maricopa, AZ 85239.
    Please add to the route description the at grade rail crossing just before W Maricopia Casa Grande Hwy.
    Where? Can you give me a source? --PCB 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Ref #3.
      Done --PCB 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    No edit wars.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you. I believe I have fixed all errors. --PCB 04:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your quick responses. One final point and we are done — why does the lead paragraph say 40,000 vehicles per day, but the highest total in the body of the article is only 33,000 vehicles? Thanks! Racepacket (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I want the lead to be less specific. In addition, the AADT is higher elsewhere. --PCB 04:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the explanation and congratulations on another Good Article. Racepacket (talk) 04:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply