Talk:Arkansas militias during Reconstruction

Latest comment: 4 years ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 21 October 2020


Split

edit

This page was split from the {Arkansas Army National Guard Page]]Aleutian06 21:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

1881, Governor Thomas James Churchill responded by sending the Arkansas civil militia, the Quapaw Guards, to march into Perryville and secure the courthouse. The guards were there for three weeks, doing little more than lounging in the halls of the courthouse and congregating on the courthouse lawn.

added information

edit

http://library.atu.edu/adgi/AGI-1884.pdf

Rot Springs Guards ocslrmissioned by Gov J H Berry Hot Springs Guards organized to help keep peace in tm Officers of Lonoke Eagle Guards oommissioned Quapaw Guards nay annpete in d r i l l in Texas Quapaws w i l l go to ampetition in Texas Quap Guards to m e e t Hot Springs Guard in competition Faulkner County Guards organized Quap Guards going to Louisville for competition List of Quap Guard menbers going to Louisville Quap Guards leave for Louisville Quapaw Guards do w e l l in d r i l l . but error in conunand noted Quapaw Guards earn fifth place honors at Louisville Louisville pper qlains why Quaps did not place higher Quapaw Guards disband with permission of Gov J H Berry Camden has new miliitia compny

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arkansas Militia in Reconstruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 October 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply



Arkansas Militia in ReconstructionArkansas militias during Reconstruction – The current title is senseless and confused. This article (and the events) involve multiple militias that formed and were sometimes forcibly disbanded, and multiple militias operating against each other, with a variety of different names. The structure of the title is also ambiguous, and seems to suggest "the present Arkansas Militia (i.e. National Guard) being reconstructed". Potentially even more WP:PRECISE titles could be created, e.g. "Conflicts between militias in Arkansas during the Reconstruction era", but I think the proposed title better fits WP:CONCISE, is WP:NATURAL, and is precise and recognizable enough. Maybe "Arkansas militias during the Reconstruction", if people really like to put "the" in front of it, but I note that the majority of our articles on this era (e.g. "History of [state name]") have sections that use "Reconstruction" not "the Reconstruction", so that's a WP:CONSISTENT issue. PS: This entire article was a stylistic train wreck; I've done a top-to-bottom cleanup pass on it.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  10:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.