Talk:Army general (France)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nov 9 Revert
editI saw that an anon user had pretty much scrapped the entire article and written a new one in its place, deleting the picture in the process and not containing any links or syntax. While some of the info in the new article was very valid and informative, I feel that it should have been added to the existing article instead of the first article blanked and a second one put on top. Rather than pick out the various items from the new article, I reverted to the last full version. Hopefully, the new info can be added in, inside of simply replacing the existing article. -Husnock 14:43, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Army general (France). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090627064416/http://www.servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr:80/04histoire/dossierdushd/grade/grade2.htm to http://www.servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr/04histoire/dossierdushd/grade/grade2.htm#
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)