Talk:Arnaud Amalric

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality?

"One of the greatest pigs of all time"? Is that really needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.77.26 (talk) 01:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

That was the garden variety Vandalism. Skarebo (talk) 02:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

the whole article is biased toward the catholic...... 96.20.223.192 (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

"Kill them all"

Caesarius sentence in latin is "coedite eos" meaning "kill them". The add of the "all" is an insertion. This is not my personal opinion. I could quote medieval historian Malcolm Barber: "The notorious phrase, 'kill them all, God will know his own'... is usually (although not invariably) discounted by serious historians. However, the quotation is frequently used by those wishing to promote the idea of northern brutality, intent upon crushing southern civilisation... It is noticeable that most commentators insert "all" for the sake of emphasis and omit fertur dixisse by which Caesarius makes clear that this is hearsay."(M. Barber, "The Cathars: Dualist Heretics in Languedoc in the High Middle Ages", p. 211/12 note 20). This Barber's comment is valide also for WP articles. --Domics (talk) 07:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

I haven't heard what is claimed to be the modern phrase "Kill them all and let God sort them out", so I've asked for a citation. Arnaud Amalric's phrase as originally attributed is significantly different: it quotes the New Testament (Tim II 2.19) for the assertion that God knows who are his own. (Already.) Andrew Dalby 08:42, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

The English phrase gets over 100,000 Google hits. I seem to remember reading a news report of a Lebanese militiaman wearing a T-shirt with the slogan in the 1980s... AnonMoos (talk) 15:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arnaud Amalric. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120220034410/http://gahom.ehess.fr/relex/dialogusmiraculorum1/CdH-Dialog.mir.-Vol1/CdH-Dialog.mir.-Volume1-308.html to http://gahom.ehess.fr/relex/dialogusmiraculorum1/CdH-Dialog.mir.-Vol1/CdH-Dialog.mir.-Volume1-308.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Surname

"Arnaud Amalric" or "Arnaud Amaury"? The current page uses the first variant in its title, but introduces the man using the second. Which is more appropriate? Are they renderings in different dialects, or is one just an error? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.248.191 (talk) 23:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)