Talk:Arpeggione

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Zaslav in topic Restrictive clause


No Image

edit

The infobox looks tacky with the image missing like that. Could either an image be added or the infobox be fixed so that the image is optional? DavidRF 03:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Made the image optional in the infobox; don't think I broke anything in the process. We'll see... __Just plain Bill 04:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I took the image sitting in the article and put it into the infobox.Jacqke (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arpeggione. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Restrictive clause

edit

User:Revirvlkodlaku: "its invention around 1823, by the Viennese instrument luthiers Johann Georg Stauffer and Peter Teufelsdorfer." Here "by the Viennese instrument luthiers Johann Georg Stauffer and Peter Teufelsdorfer" is neither a clause (not crucial) nor is it non-restrictive (crucial). It is decidedly restrictive since it says who did the inventing. If you disagree, please explain yourself. Thank you. Zaslav (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply