Talk:Arran whitebeams
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Separate articles
editThese twothree species need to be split from each other into their own individual articles. --Rkitko (talk) 17:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see a pressing need to split the article - it's conventional to treat them together - but the article title would be better as Arran Whitebeams (if it was so it would be possible to redirect species names thereto) Lavateraguy (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- It could well be "both/and" rather than "either/or". I certainly think the subject deserves an overall treatment, but there is no need to avoid having a separate article for the individual species with a suitable "See also" if someone is inspired to create them. Definitely agree that first steps are to move the page and create re-directs per Lavateraguy. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 10:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've been bold and revised this. It turns out that there were already articles for all three species, but one of them had a misspelt title. Took quite a bit of clearing up. Lavateraguy (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Good work and thanks. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 10:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've been bold and revised this. It turns out that there were already articles for all three species, but one of them had a misspelt title. Took quite a bit of clearing up. Lavateraguy (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- It could well be "both/and" rather than "either/or". I certainly think the subject deserves an overall treatment, but there is no need to avoid having a separate article for the individual species with a suitable "See also" if someone is inspired to create them. Definitely agree that first steps are to move the page and create re-directs per Lavateraguy. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 10:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arran whitebeams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926231618/http://www.ardacad.co.uk/quad/quad7.html to http://www.ardacad.co.uk/quad/quad7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)