Talk:Arrapha

Location and name

AFAIK there is no evidence, archaeological or otherwise that Arrapha is located at Kirkuk. It might be, but it could also be somewhere else in the region. Similarly, I know of no evidence for the derivation of the name claimed in the article.Ploversegg (talk) 06:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrapha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060515084141/http://www.assyriansofkirkuk.com:80/index.html to http://www.assyriansofkirkuk.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Unclear source

• 2 Edwards, Charlesworth & Boardman 1970, p. 433
• 3 Edwards, Charlesworth & Boardman 1970, p. 443
• 9 I. E. S. Edwards, John Boardman, John B. Bury, S. A. Cook. The Cambridge Ancient History. p. 178–179.

These are very unclear. I can guess that they are probably "The Cambridge Ancient History". However "The Cambridge Ancient History" are published many years and many edition.

Especially no.9 is terrible. That has no publish year.

No.2 and no.3 are also but. Google book found several "The Cambridge Ancient History 1970". And I read all 1970ed, but there are unrelated articles on p.433 and p.443. --シダー近藤 (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)