Requested move 12 January 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved Artashat (ancient city) to Artaxata. Did not perform the move of Artashat, Armenia to Artashat since the proposed target is occupied by a DAB page. File a new move request and explain what to do with the DAB page if you disagree. EdJohnston (talk) 19:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


{{requested move/dated}}

Artashat (ancient city)ArtaxataWP:COMMONAME Երևանցի talk 18:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Similar to Tigranocerta (Tigranakert). In English, the Greek version of the names of ancient Armenian cities is more common. Britannica and Iranica both go with Artaxata.

Google Books search for "Artaxata"/"Artashat" ancient


Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

No time (period, century) indicated in the legends

edit

The period, or at least the century, is missing from all plans, illustrations, and the reconstruction! Treated like a legend, "way back, in the good ole' days". One single photo has this type of info, it allegedly shows Urartian remains, but based on what? Archaeology and history start and end on the time axis, w/o it's just a nice illustrated fairy tale. Arminden (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply