Talk:Artemis and the Stag
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Artemis and the Stag appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 November 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Artemis and the Stag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100201064312/http://artvoice.com/issues/v6n8/war_against_the_albright_knox to http://artvoice.com/issues/v6n8/war_against_the_albright_knox
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123012835/http://www.artsjournal.com/man/2007/03/reexamining_deaccessioning_at.html to http://www.artsjournal.com/man/2007/03/reexamining_deaccessioning_at.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Needs an update
editThe page says the statue is on display at the Met as of October, 2019. Still there? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Why so little about its origin and provenance?
editSuch a large and important sculpture from antiquity deserves more said about its history, rediscovery and provenance than just "The sculpture...is believed to have been made some time between the 1st century BC and the 1st century AD. It was originally excavated in the 1920s from a construction site in Rome and has since changed hands several times before finding a home at the Albright-Knox Art Gallery..." An entire book was published about the history of the Venus de Milo. Surely a few more sentences are warranted here for this highly significant work of art. Bricology (talk) 05:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)