Talk:Arthur Dove

Discussion

That discussion continues...Modernist (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Discussion was closed in favor of removal. Werieth (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Coldcreation

Your revert of my edits to Arthur Dove is in direct contracted with the policy-backed consensus at WP:NFCR. Regardless of whether there is a FUR, consensus determined that the images fail WP:NFCC and should therefore be removed. I do not care either way, I just made the close as an uninvolved editor. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I do care. These images need to be seen. Coldcreation (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

So, because YOU feel the images need to be seen, its okay to go against WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NFCC? -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

No need to scream. I will find more public domain images of this important artists works (published before 1923). Coldcreation (talk) 22:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I do apologize for raising my caps; you are correct that was uncalled for. Also, I should have phrased it better, I do not care if the images are used. But I do care if policy is followed and consensus determined that those images did not. It looks like there are many many paintings by Dove that are in the public domain. The other option is to make the images not violate WP:NFCC (specifically #8) and gain consensus for their inclusion. As an outsider, it looks like there is no context of the Me and the Moon image in the infobox. Per WP:NFCC there must be critical commentary and there was none. For the other image (Nature Symbolized or Reefs) the article only discusses that he creates it. Point 8 of WP:NFCC requires that there be content in the article about the non-free images that requires the images be included. What this breaks down to is you don't need to see the image to know he painted it. But if there were content about the style he painted on that specific image, and why he painted, or the colors, etc, it would be necessary to the image being there. Good luck with whatever you choose to do. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

• Comment Many American painters forgot to affix a copyright notice to paintings when they were exhibited at art galleries. Such paintings are in the public domain per {{PD-US-no notice}}. To qualify for {{PD-US-no notice}}, the exhibition must have been before 1978, the painting must have been without a copyright notice, the exhibition must have been open to the general public, and the art gallery or museum must not have prohibited photography when the painting was exhibited. Many American paintings are also in the public domain because the painter didn't renew the copyright; see {{PD-US-not renewed}}. It is therefore possible that all paintings by this painter might be in the public domain, but this may be hard to show as you may need to know the exhibition history for a painting and know whether a particular museum permitted photography in the 1930s or 1940s. See Commons:Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US for some further information. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Stefan appreciated...Modernist (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arthur Dove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080512162949/http://www.hollistaggart.com:80/artists/dove.htm to http://www.hollistaggart.com/artists/dove.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: O'Keeffe

His work influenced later abstract landscape painters, such as Julian Hatton and Georgia O'Keeffe, in having "an unbridled love of pure, hot color."

True, but he was also influenced by O'Keeffe in turn, returning to her early watercolors in the mid-1930s. This was brought home by the curators of the exhibition "Dove/O'Keeffe: Circles of Influence" in 2009. Viriditas (talk) 22:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)