Talk:Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge

Official Name

The bridge was named by an act of the general assembly as the Arthur Ravenel, Jr. Bridge with a comma between Ravenel and Jr. See the text of the act here.

I understand that many style guides say not to place the comma between the surname and the suffix. Given that the bridge was was officially named with the comma, should we use it? Any thoughts? - Charles 23:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

How do you know it was officially named with a comma? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.204.246.126 (talk) 23:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC).

The link given above says:

The Department of Transportation is directed to name the new bridge to be built over the Cooper River in Charleston County the "Arthur Ravenel, Jr. Bridge".

So the state law officially names it with a comma. - SCgatorFan 02:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Photos

The new Arthur Ravenel Bridge in historic Charleston, SC is an engineering marvel. It was particularly stunning during the bridge dedication fireworks in July 2005. To view photographs from that legendary night, please visit Ravenel Fireworks Photos

Might it be possible for a better picture of Arthur Ravenel to be used in this article, or for the current picture of him to be removed? This matter is simply an issue of personal preference; it just seems to me that the current one is *really bad.*

is it Pearman or Pearlman?

Look into it.

It's Pearman. Sbrawner

The full name of the second bridge was the Silas N. Pearman Bridge. The word Memorial was not in the formal name for this bridge. It was for the first Cooper River Bridge, the John P. Grace Memorial Bridge. I have removed the word Memorial. Charles 02:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Public transportation qualification

Article currently states this "is the longest cable-stayed bridge that carries vessels other than public transportation". It then defines what public transportation is, but does not explain what this bridge carries other than passenger cars. Is there a rail or light rail line over the bridge? Bus-only lanes? Tedder 00:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

First, I didn't include that sentence. However, I believe that the sentence means that this bridge is the longest "normal" cable stayed highway bridge, but it doesn't mention that Skybridge (Vancouver) is longer. Skybridge (Vancouver) carries only public transportation, hence the requirement to qualify this bridges "longest" statement with, longest that carries something other than public transportation. Perhaps it should be reworded to longest carrying vehicular traffic since it looks like Skybridge only carries light rail. --Dual Freq 02:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree the wording should be changed, it is a bit confusing as is. Sbrawner

How is the Skybridge longer? The Ravenel has a span of 1,546 ft (471 m) and the Skybridge has a span of 340 meters (1,115 ft). - Charles 02:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Rail line on bridge?

I live in Charleston and I am baffled as to what is meant by "other than public transportation." There is no rail line and the traffic on the bridge is no different than on any other highway. Perhaps "other than public transportation" meant big rigs? 69.242.196.233 02:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050205123518/http://www4.charleston.net:80/ to http://www.charleston.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000915194137/http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outreach/safesobr/21qp/html/coming_attractions/bike_month.html to http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outreach/SafeSobr/21qp/html/coming_attractions/bike_month.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Original research in comparison of Ravenel/Talmadge/Lanier bridges

Is there any source for a rivalry among Charleston, Brunswick and Savannah over the height and dimensions of their large bridges? Those sections (Talmadge Memorial Bridge#Comparison with Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge and the Sidney Lanier Bridge; Sidney Lanier Bridge#Comparison with two other bridges; Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge#Comparison with Talmadge Memorial Bridge and Sidney Lanier Bridge) seem to be nothing but original research and should be removed if there's no RS indicating these articles need sections comparing them with these specific bridges. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)