Talk:Artificial Intelligence (EP)
 | Artificial Intelligence (EP) was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 2, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Album versus EP
editWhilst finding sources to use for this article, it came to my attention that sources vary when it comes to describing Artificial Intelligence as an album or an extended play. Below is an analysis of each relevant source and how they refer to the project.
Refer to it as an album:
- A July 16th article by the Music about an as-yet untitled album
- ARIA says it's a "debut album"
- Mediaweek also labels it a debut album
- Apple Music (a primary source) categorises it within "Albums" as opposed to "Singles and EPs"
- Bandcamp (a primary source again) loosely describes it as an album
Refer to it as neither, or in the middle:
- Triple J describes it both as an album and an extended play
- An August 11th article by the Music fails to categorise it as either
Refer to it as an EP:
- An August 16th article by the Music describes it as an EP
- Band T-Shirts (official merchandise) refers to it an EP
- Cardy's official release date announcement on Instagram calls the project an EP.
There are four sources, including the artist himself, which call it an EP, as opposed to two which directly refer to it as an album. If you disagree with my assessment of it as an EP, please change all references of it as such (both within the article and externally) and replace the category Tom Cardy EPs with Tom Cardy albums. Sean Stephens (talk) 11:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Artificial Intelligence (EP)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 10:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
This article fails one of the six GA criteria, in such an undeniable way.
- Let's begin to take a closer look at the infobox genre, it is dubbed as a "comedy" album. However the composition section states "incorporates elements of comedy music", elements of something don't make it a genre. A rock album can incorporate elements of pop music but doesn't make it a pop album.
- It is well written enough but is no surprise when it completely fails the criteria: "Broad in its coverage" as the Recording, Composition, Promotion, and Critical reception have one sentence each.
- Missing some authors on the references.
- It can't address the main aspects of the topic; once again it doesn't have enough information as it is present.
- On the Commercial performance, Triple J is not considered a chart like ARIA or others. It is just a radio station like many others in Australia, sure it's a nice accolade, but I wouldn't bring it up on the commercial performance. On top of this, doesn't Cardy work for Triple J? Makes it even less worthy.
- On the personnel section; no engineers, mixing, mastering? I find it hard to believe, once again the information is probably not available.
To sum up, and this is not your fault, the range of coverage is alarming for this article. I'm not sure as it is B-status, at best it could be a start article. I strongly advise you to take a look at other GA and FA articles as there are plenty of them. Please don't nominate this or any other article in this shape, again. As of right now, you can't address the big issue within the usual time, as to bring this article to the aforementioned status would require a lot of research on the web, books and other sources you can get your hands on. I believe I have justified myself regarding the quick-fail of this article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)