Talk:Artificial intelligence/Archive 14
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xc1181, Kph7917, XiaoyuChennyu (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Xc1181 (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Cognitive systems
The term "Cognitive system" is redirected to this article on artificial intelligence, although it is not described or even mentioned here. See also [[cognitive computing), where a diagram of a cognitive system is shown. --Bautsch (talk) 07:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- If what you want is for "Cognitive system" to point to cognitive computing instead, I agree that it would make more sense. Alenoach (talk) 21:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Should we add this image?
I reverted the addition of this image. I just wanted to ask whether we should integrate it (or this more readable version) somewhere in the article. The benefit is that it can quickly clarify the hierarchy between AI, ML, neural networks and generative AI, which are commonly confused, so it has some educative value. The cons are that there is already this image in the article, that it is not as aesthetic as the rest, that the text font is relatively small, and that it doesn't seem to integrate well in the introduction with the fact that there is already the artificial intelligence template. One other issue is that while the large majority of modern generative AI models are in practice based on neural networks, it does not seem to be the case for all generative AI models, which makes the hierarchy conceptually shaky. So overall, I would tend to oppose the addition of the image. Alenoach (talk) 21:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's an over-simplification the focuses too much on the current hotness. If we need such a diagram, I'd prefer a more cluttered diagram over one that implies that there's exactly one interesting aspect of each category.
- Maybe it would fit better in the article on generative models. ApLundell (talk) 22:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with the removal. The image is overly simplistic and likely misleading in this article. No image belongs at the very top of the article where this one was placed. And it looks the editor who placed it here has been indefinitely blocked for "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia." Elspea756 (talk) 13:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)