Talk:Artistic development of Tom Thomson
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Artistic development of Tom Thomson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unprecedented?
editFirst of all, thank you to Outriggr for pushing me to make this page. I haven't seen any topics along these lines on Wikipedia before, (nothing like this for Vincent van Gogh, Leonardo da Vinci or Rembrandt) so in some sense I'm making it up as I go along. Hopefully this page proves a valuable addition. Obviously this means that suggestions are welcome as to how this page could be improved! Thanks, Tkbrett (✉) 20:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good to me! Now onto Rembrandt... :-) I think a new category for Thomson is justified--not sure how else to categorize it. Outriggr (talk) 23:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Artistic Development of Tom Thomson
editDear T. K. Brett, you have worked very hard on this article. Could I suggest using another sketch to canvas comparison?Joan arden murray (talk) 19:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the kind words; they especially mean a lot coming from someone like yourself. As a non-expert, I relied heavily on your books and the Tom Thomson Catalogue Raisonné while writing the Tom Thomson page and all of its related spin-offs. Do you have any particular recommendation on the sketch to canvas comparison? I picked Opulent October partly out of excitement in seeing the sketch in David Silcox's electronic book. I presumed that sketch was discovered sometime between 2011 and Silcox's book being published in 2015 given its absence from the Catalogue Raisonné. Tkbrett (✉) 22:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Here are some choices.
In the Northland 1915-1916.05 (sketch 1915.94) Chill November 1916-1917.12 (sketch 1916.135) The West Wind 1916-1917.15 (sketch 1916.31) If you have trouble getting reproductions, I will help you. (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- I also like The Birch Grove, 1915-1916.26 (1915.27)Joan arden murray (talk) 13:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
I switched it around to In the Northland and its associated sketch per your recommendation. It helps that this is also the comparison David Silcox uses in his electronic book. This sketch-canvas pair certainly seems to be more representative of Thomson's work more generally than Opulent October. Tkbrett (✉) 14:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Excellent choice! Yours is a handsome and well-considered article.Joan arden murray (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)