This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The second section of President of the Privy Council reads decidedly with an unencyclopedic tone – we all know that he was a very nice guy that everyone must admire (?), but the text shall not force us by making advertizements for Arvid Horn. I have a slight allergy against: "bold", "strong enough to prevent", "bitterly but unjustly accused", "triumphant". The last sentence just S*XX Horribly! and gives any sane person nausea. Said: Rursus☻07:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I tried to tone down the 1911 Britannica POV in the section you mention. I didn't do anything about "triumphant" since the "Hats" apparently got their way. The whole article probably suffers from just having one source. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
