Talk:Aseptic processing

Latest comment: 1 year ago by BeingObjective in topic Food and Pharma - the original version is incorrect.

Untitled

edit

"Pharmaceuticals being life saving, their packages are never recycled."

Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.188.220.208 (talk) 14:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Briannyakundi335.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aseptic processing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aseptic processing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Too US-centric

edit

The article has an excessively US-based bias. For example, Tetra Pak is mentioned as an introduction to the US market. It originated in Sweden and was exported around Europe before it arrived in the USA, I believe.

Marchino61 (talk) 10:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Some confusion in this article - too food centric!

edit

The opening of this article is very misleading - it has been edited. The term more usually is cold filter sterilization - not maintenance of the sterility of a heat sterilized product using aseptic techniques during transfer to a final packaged format. Though clearly you do want this and thus the confusion.


The sections on document and record keeping are distractions and likely belong in an article relating to 'Regulated Industry'.


There is a big red flag here - reprocessing - FDA issues!!!


The original article is food centric - but this process and expression are very common in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products - largely injectable products.


Needs more work. BeingObjective (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Food and Pharma - the original version is incorrect.

edit

The term is used BOTH in Pharma and Food - I made it reflect this - I do not see a need for two separate articles - and the intro - is accurate and has solid ref. This is not a subtle matter and the prior/reverted version are simply incorrect - PLEASE discuss here an do not enter into a edit war - especially if you are not a PHARMA or FOOD industry pro. BeingObjective (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your revision was neither constructive nor aids the reader's understanding of the topic. And no, you don't have to be a pro to edit an article. --WikiLinuz (talk) 02:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
BO's edits (plural: it is not ONE single revision) are less wrong compared to what we have here.
  • The lede is a little too scattered, but that is fixable.
  • Pharma sites are not RS, true, but it's enough to show that such term does have such a meaning. A little digging down that line (web search "aseptic processing pharmaceutical") reveals PMID 25902628, 12189724. A focus on compounding pharmacies compared to production line machines in journal-literature is expected here, because machines are more likely found in patents.
  • The FDA stuff should be restored, but it does need VERY HEAVY trimming. Like why are we talking about forms and filing systems? To know that low-acid needs attention for endospores, and that there's inspection and incubation tests for food, is enough.
Artoria2e5 🌉 05:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/aseptic-processing-primer
https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-guides/aseptic-processing-and-packaging-food-industry
Likely two articles - though I am not getting embroiled. BeingObjective (talk) 13:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also, pharma websites are not reliable. --WikiLinuz (talk) 02:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/aseptic-processing-primer

https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-guides/aseptic-processing-and-packaging-food-industry BeingObjective (talk) 13:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply