Talk:Aseroe coccinea/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Nice :) Here we go:

• In Taxonomy; segment "The fungus was first described by the Japanese mycologists Yoshimi and Tsuguo Hongo in a 1989 publication with a Japanese description, based on a specimen collected on September 29, 1985 in Utsunomiya, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. The name, however, was not published validly, according to Article 36.1 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, which requires that "in order to be validly published, be accompanied by a Latin description or diagnosis or by a reference to a previously and effectively published Latin description or diagnosis". Taiga Kasuya reexamined the type specimen and validated the species in a 2007 Mycoscience publication."

• Albeit in Japanese, did Yoshimi and Hongo suggest a generic placement, with the specimen being the type species; or did Kasuya in '07?

• Tossed in some Latin (ad interim, nomen invalidum) to help clarify the taxonomy. Better? Sasata (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

• In Descr., complete this sentence: "The inner membranous, with a hyaline (translucent) endoperidium (inner tissue layer)."

• Ooops... words got lost somewhere... added. Sasata (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

• Mention edibility in mycobox/lead/Descr. Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

• Done. Thanks Rcej!

Great fixes! Pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Results of review =

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Aseroe coccinea passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass