Talk:Ash Ketchum

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Pokelego999 in topic Change the photo

Good articleAsh Ketchum has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 27, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 2, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 31, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the constant losses of Pokémon series protagonist Ash Ketchum have been highlighted for teaching positive lessons to viewers?
Current status: Good article

Loosely based on Red

edit

@NegativeMP1, @Pokelego999 do you have some sources about the statement "loosely based on Red"? Because there are no sources about this and this aspect of the character is only discussed in the lead section Redjedi23 (talk) 14:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good catch, didn't notice that wasn't verified in the lead. Pokelego can you remove that line please? λ NegativeMP1 15:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Maybe we could use this article (https://screenrant.com/pokemon-gary-blue-related-professor-oak-same-person/, the same that we use to state that Gary is based on Green) to say that Ash is based on Red. If this is the case, we should integrate this information in the body of the article (I could do it myself if you want) Redjedi23 (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@NegativeMP1 I'm out right now, but I'll make some edits once I'm back home. Completely missed that one while I was doing my edits. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@NegativeMP1, @Pokelego999 I noticed another issue. In the lead section, it is stated that Ash appeared in several manga series, with a wikilink to Pokémon Pocket Monsters. The problem is that it is not the only manga in which Ash appeared so I would remove this wikilink. Also, the manga Pokémon Pocket Monsters that we wikilinked in the lead section has zero mentions in the body of the article, even in the "In the video games and manga" section.
I just removed the wikilink from the lead section, but I feel that this aspect must be discussed in the article, especially because it is a GA, what do you think? Redjedi23 (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Edit: Nevermind, I just noticed that Pokémon Pocket Monsters doesn't even see Ash Ketchum as the main character, so the situation should be fine just right now.Reply
Not even sure why that was there, honestly, given the above reasons, but again, it was something I missed during my edits. Thank you for catching some of the smaller things that I've missed, it's greatly appreciated. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 03:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that Pokémon series protagonist Ash Ketchum has been highlighted as a major part of what has made the Pokémon anime series so successful? Source: https://www.gamesradar.com/pokemon-is-retiring-ash-and-pikachu-and-im-a-little-heartbroken/
    "That enduring fondness likely wouldn't exist without Ash and Pikachu. For more than a thousand episodes across more than two and a half decades, the pair have been the functional face of the entire franchise, a constant as the series evolved across different games, different regions, different consoles."
    "It's the end of an era that has spanned more than 1,200 episodes, making the duo's tenure key to one of the longest-running anime series ever."
    "New Pokemon might grace my screen, but Ash and Pikachu would be an unchanging presence, anchoring not only the show, but the entire franchise."
    • ALT1: ... that the constant losses of Pokémon series protagonist Ash Ketchum have been highlighted for teaching positive lessons to viewers? Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-49719746
      ""Putting it bluntly, it was like being a loser is OK. The important lesson is to pick yourself back up, roll with the punches and keep going.""
      ""There was something really beautiful about seeing that growing up - that it's OK if you're not the strongest, the most qualified, as long as you keep trying to be the best person you can be, the nicest you can be to people around you.""
    • Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by TorreFernando (talk). Nominated by Pokelego999 (talk) at 20:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ash Ketchum; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   Article passes criteria. New enough (Promoted to GA within 7 days of nom), long enough. Since article passed GA review, pretty easily clears the DYK criteria for being well-sourced, as well as presentable. Earwig flags two sources with as mildly high "possible violations" but they're direct quotes. Maybe(?) could use some tweaking/paraphrasing to improve article, but for the purposes of appearing on the DYK section, that shouldn't impede it from inclusion tbh. Hooks are sourced properly. QPQ is moot because seems to be nominator's first time nominating. I def prefer ALT1 to ALT0, but they both have interesting angles. Soulbust (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


Oops, made a mistake in here. Accidentally put the original creator as the one who improved it to GA status when I was the one who did that. Not a big deal but thought I'd make note of it. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Voice actors section

edit

The "Voice actors" section doesn't have the necessary sources. It is written in the section that the first name of Ash in the series was "Casey", but it isn't stated in the source at the end of the paragraph. Also, there aren't any sources about the original voice actors (Rica Matsumoto and Hana Takeda). I feel like this section should be improved, maybe including more details about the original voice actor in order to give a more WP:GLOBAL view of the subject. Redjedi23 (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've just added a few sources on Matsumoto, though I couldn't find as much dev info as Natochenney or Taylor. There may be some stuff I'm missing in Japanese sources, so I'll likely look into that, but for now Matsumoto now has some citations referencing her tenure, and likely more can be added worst comes to worst. Takeda I ended up cutting due to the fact I couldn't find sources discussing her performance at all. I'll probably look deeper into that as well but for now the issues you've brought up have been addressed. If you happen to have any sources handy on those areas I mentioned, I'd greatly appreciate them as well. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I found this source for the Ash/Casey stuff: [1]. Regarding Matsumoto, I found this sources: [2], [3]
I also found this source that talks about Hana Takeda: [4], but it is only a list of voice actors of the episode Redjedi23 (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry that took so long, added. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry, thank you! Redjedi23 (talk) 11:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Change the photo

edit

Change the Ash photo to the one from JOURNEYS --PyukumukuAce (talk) 15:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@PyukumukuAce the current photo is used because it depicts Ash's most consistent and well-known design, making it better for purposes of identification than the Journeys image. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply