Talk:Ashes to Ashes (Original Soundtrack Album)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Antara-2009
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ashes to Ashes (Original Soundtrack Album) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Among the Original Album Cover and Other Reliable Sources, included promotional, as Amazon, iTunse etc. it Obviously, that correct title must contain "Original Soundtrack", not Soundtrack. In Wikipedia there is no any rules how to make titles similar situations. So, it is permissible that it will be "Original Soundtrack Album" in Titles. There are much similar states in wikipedia with first title "Original Soundtrack Album" and some redirects after this. So , You need to rename this title to "Ashes to Ashes (Original Soundtrack Album)" --Antara-2009 (talk) 14:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- The claim to add citation for confirmation of using titles "Ashes to Ashes – Series 1 (Original Soundtrack)" and "Ashes to Ashes – Volume 1 (Original Soundtrack)" is inaccurate, because there are External links that reflect this information precisely. Moreover, User JD554 (talk) was deleted reliable sources BUT commercial like Amazon.co.uk, itunes UK Store that contains which are official promotion by owner of this product. So, there are different names for this product in Internet. The most useful are specified in an article. Antara-2009 (talk) 16:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- More over, the variation of titles - is fact, that we can know from Internet surfing. So This is not fundamentally wrong, no one misleads. User JD554 (talk), if you make similar next time your remarks will be seen as vandalism. If you have some questions, let's discuss it here firstly. I finished all three states. But you are something wrong. What problem? Let's discuss it. --Antara-2009 (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)