Talk:Ashleigh Barty

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Fyunck(click) in topic Renaming, 2022 edition

Cricket career?

edit

There is a total mismatch between the info on her cricket career in the 'Career Statistics' box and the narrative headed "Hiatus . . ." Cross Reference (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Someone had changed the headers from Women's National Cricket League to WLA and Women's Big Bash League to WT20. I put an in-between fix. It probably looked wrong because the Brisbane league matches don't count for the WT20 totals. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 18:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 10 July 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) NO CONSENSUS User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Despite the vote being more than 2-1 against a move, this is a "no consensus" close and not a "consensus not to move" close. Many of the votes are pure votes, and several of them make claims that are contrary to policy. There is no policy against using nicknames as a title if they are common names. However, there is no consensus whether Ashleigh or Ash is more commonly used in the news media. Regarding self-identification, while her Twitter account uses Ash, her ITF profile is Ashleigh, and opposers state that she would use a nickname there if she strongly preferred it. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC) User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


Ashleigh BartyAsh BartyWP:COMMONNAME. News sources overwhelming refer to her as Ash Barty and she seems to refer to herself by that name on her social media. Park3r (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

You need to compare the two names to show which is the common name. Just looking at one name is not a comparison. Hzh (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment. Yes, recentism, but would we be advised to wait and see what the post-Wimbledon and Olympics coverage does with her name? That may tip the scale on what her common name is. —C.Fred (talk) 01:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support due to Barty's self-reference, primarily. WTA, Grand Slam, etc. is just a formality. —Jonny Nixon (talk) 02:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. We made a similar decision in the case of Dan Evans (or Daniel Evans, per the ATP/ITF). Rovingrobert (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • 'Oppose. No evidence provided that Ash Barty is the common name, in fact Google Trends suggests Ashleigh Barty is the common name - [3]. Hzh (talk) 12:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per others { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 21:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Huge Oppose that's more of a nickname. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per above. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 05:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose leave as is. Her name is Ashleigh, the diminutive should not be the title of the article. Violette Martin (talk) 09:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support 410k for Ash vs 73k for Ashleigh google hits on .com.au sites, where they are much more likely to use her preferred name in articles, rather than just what is in the official guidebook. Countering Somnifuguist's counts, when you restrict it to intitle and .com.au, there are 2800 for Ash and 700 for Ashleigh. It's not "just a nickname," it's literally her preferred name, as per her own social media sites. As per the guideline "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used". The-Pope (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
    @The-Pope: The claim referred to news sources. My counts limit the search to Google's news tab, and "intitle:" ensures it's not just a passing mention. Without intitle it is 3.2:1.4 million Ashleigh:Ash. Your counts aren't limited to news sites, so any blog, forum, etc. is included, which is out of the scope of the initial claim. Limiting to .com.au sites does show that "Ash" is more commonly used in Australia, but that doesn't say much given that using nicknames for everyone (and especially sportspeople) is part of Australian culture. Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia, so we should use the 2:1 globally preferred name, not a locally favoured diminutive. It is not similar to Dan Evans mentioned above, where the diminutive is 2:1 preferred by global news sources [4][5]. —Somnifuguist (talk) 18:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Something else. Her notability is directly related to her tennis prowess. She must register with the ITF in order to compete in any tennis event and she registers with her preferred spelling of her first name. It's her choice. She has registered under "Ashleigh Barty." It's what she wants to be called in her profession. She can change it if she wants with the ITF. Stanislaw Wawrinka went by Stanislaw for quite awhile but later changed his name in the ITF database to Stan. Wikipedia did likewise shortly thereafter. If Ashleigh wants to be known as "Ash" in tennis all she has to do is contact the ITF. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Her notability is also directly related to her cricket prowess. She is on the cricket.com.au website as Ash. The-Pope (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose for now: I have never heard her referred to as "Ash" (I've heard "Ashleigh" on news broadcasts and tennis commentaries). If she is routinely referred to as "Ash" later on, we can revisit this request. --Mirokado (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - "None" of her accomplishments (official tennis records) list her as "Ash"... also not WTA, Olympics, etc. I prefer to be known as "Arrrmondo"... with 3r's...Doesn't change my passport... Mjquinn_id (talk) 22:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support I agree to change.

She is always reffered to as Ash Barty. You rarely hear her full name. User:14.200.53.228 – posted in the wrong Talk section; reposted by Rovingrobert (talk) 07:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose If she wanted to be known professionally as Ash Barty, she would've changed her name in her WTA and ITF profiles. 'Ash' is an informal nickname, which is said as often as 'Ashleigh' during her matches. Almost nobody says Daniel Evans or Cori Gauff anymore.--Narciso003 (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Weak support She is overwhelmingly referred to as just Ash Barty in the press, and she has made it plain that she prefers Ash to Ashleigh, as is the case with Stan Wawrinka, Coco Gauff, and Dan Evans. However: her name on the ITF and WTA website is still listed as Ashleigh Barty, so that throws a spanner into the works, somewhat. --Alexxbrookss (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose We don't use nicknames in article titles. HiLo48 (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Strong support: Clear common name. The fact that the article has existed at the longer title for so long is incredulous. I'm surprised to see so many editors disagreeing, and being especially vague in their reasoning for doing so. Sean Stephens (talk) 00:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Comment. I nominated the article for moving (and stand by that request). I strongly suspect, however, you'll find a geographic divide between those who oppose the move and those who support it. Australian media (Barty's home country) do indeed overwhelmingly refer to her as "Ash" (as does the athlete herself). Park3r (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I also think it depends on informal vs formal. The Australian Open formally calls her Ashleigh as seen here, but has writers do more informal stories that use Ash, such as here. She has asked tennis authorities to use Asleigh, but she can always change her maind as Stan Wawrinka did. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have had my say on this, I think WP:COMMONNAME is the governing policy here.Park3r (talk) 22:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Renaming, 2022 edition

edit

Recent coverage, post-retirement seems heavily skewed towards calling her "Ash". The titling of this Wikipedia article is increasingly anachronistic. Furthermore, she has credited herself as Ash Barty in her November 2022-released memoir. Park3r (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have wondered why we stick with Barty's birth name "Ashleigh", rather than the more common "Ash". We do not have articles titled "Nicholas Kyrgios", "Rodney Laver", "Anthony Roche" or "Kenneth Rosewall"; Australia is known for applying hypocorisms as common names. An unscientific count at Google reveals "Ash Barty" has 1.8 million Ghits, whereas "Ashleigh Barty" has 1.1 million Ghits. WWGB (talk) 03:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Many participants in the previous move discussion from mid-2021 didn't seem to really take Wikipedia policy into account, as per the closing statement. I think that there was a strong split between Australian and non-Australian sources and voters. Now that she's retired, I suspect the sources are going to be more strongly skewed to Ash. Time to reopen? Park3r (talk) 03:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
But we also have to be careful with recentism. She became notable as Ashleigh Barty and she never changed her Tennis registration to anything but Ashleigh Barty. Does her drivers license say Ash? Do her checks? She's Australian yet her info/bio at he Australian Open says Ashleigh. Does someone have a copy of her wedding license from this past July? Those things are usually public records. Is she now going by Kissick? The governing bodies of tennis still use Ashleigh. We usually use the name they become notable under, like we do with Helen Wills. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:15, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I would be surprised if Ms Barty has ever signed a cheque, let alone a check. Such things are almost non-existent in Australia today. HiLo48 (talk) 08:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Considering all the kids who can't write in script at all, that's probably true for many items. Fyunck(click) (talk) 16:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
True, but especially for cheques in Australia. I'm old, and I haven't signed one for at least ten years. HiLo48 (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Heck, I'm old and in the US and it's probably 10 years for me too (until today when I wrote out a check to the installers for a new central ac unit). Lot's of dust on the checkbook. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Documents like a wedding certificate and a driver licence require legal names, not common names. Not relevant here. WWGB (talk) 04:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
This is true but there is common, as in how the press likes to call her to be more familiar, and there's common in how official and notable organizations call her. And she gained notability as a tennis player where she specifically told the ITF how she wanted her first name presented. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If we're using the name she wants to be known by as a criterion, her memoir uses "Ash Barty". Park3r (talk) 01:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
We are kidding ourselves if we think that tennis players control the name by which tennis authorities report them. I doubt that Evonne Goolagong Cawley wanted her name recorded as "Mrs R Cawley".[31] WWGB (talk) 02:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Actually, you raise a good point. It looks like Evonne Goolagong Cawley may be mistitled as well. Is it a widespread phenomenon that WP:COMMONNAME is disregarded for female tennis players? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Park3r (talkcontribs) 04:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Tennis players DO control their names as written by tennis authorities. They must register with the ITF spelling they prefer. Stanislaw Warwinka registered with Stanislaw and later changed his ITF spelling to Stan. The registered name is what is used by the ITF/ATP/WTA for all events. Players can changed it for whatever reason they want, such as if they get married. That doesn't mean we always use the ITN registration as the Wikipedia title, but it helps with certain players. While she played professional and jr tennis she went with Ashleigh. Afterwards she seems to use Ash at least as much as Ashleigh. But if Martina Navratilova decides to change her name, the article is going to stay where it is now because of notability under Martina Navratilova. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:03, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply