Talk:Ashley, Staffordshire
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk: Ashley, Staffordshire
Can this paragraph be clarified?
editThe opening paragraph to the section History, two of whose sentences I amalgamated, still does not make sense: it reads as follows:
- The name means "land once cultivated and left fallow(Ley) in the near ash trees" Ashley Dale and Jugbank. Mainly sandstone cottages now mixed in with modern housing. From medieval times men have indiscriminately hacked clearings in the forests, then linked them with tracks and lanes following no specific pattern.
I wonder if there is a phrase missing from between the words trees" and Ashley that has perhaps been accidentally deleted in a past edit. Also would it make better chronological sense to move the sentence about housing further on in the paragraph or section?Cloptonson (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ashley, Staffordshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091002055323/http://www.loggerheadsparishcouncil.com:80/ to http://www.loggerheadsparishcouncil.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)