Talk:Asia Series

Image copyright problem with File:Cpbllogo.PNG

The image File:Cpbllogo.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• File:KBO.PNG

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Country or Organization (league)

The participants represented their corresponding organizations, not their nations. There are some "foreign" players in the teams which are non-resident or different nationality, therefore these teams should not be considered as a national team. The national flags should be removed and the organization name should be used instead of country name.--NullSpace (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

But hang on, I was following multiple comparable examples in other articles: in similar baseball tournaments look at the European Cup and Caribbean Series. Also, the only three other sports I can think of off the top of my head that have sub-national teams competing in international tournaments, in rugby union you can look at Super Rugby and Heineken Cup, in cricket you can look at Champions League Twenty20, and in association football/soccer you can look at AFC Champions League, UEFA Champions League and FIFA Club World Cup. Though I get what you're saying, it doesn't seem unreasonable the way I had it, particularly with a lot of precedents backing me up as to which way consensus, if not is then at least was leaning. Given that, would there be a major issue if it got reverted back to how I'd set it up?  Afaber012  (talk)  08:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

I didn't follow these international sports so I couldn't verify that (a) were the national flags used in the official website and during the tournaments? (b) do the teams/players follow the Eligibility rules? However, to maintain the consistency (between articles), I think it's no harm to revert it. Thanks for the detailed explanation.--NullSpace (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Asia Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111116104753/http://www.asiaseries.org:80/02year2009.asp to http://www.asiaseries.org/02year2009.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714204106/http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/sports/2010/01/136_59878.html to http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/sports/2010/01/136_59878.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111118064329/http://www.asiaseries.org:80/02year2010.asp to http://www.asiaseries.org/02year2010.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ibaf.org/en/article-detail.aspx?id=55097b82-94ae-4de0-8f02-6f640ea2845b

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)