Talk:Asiatyrannus
Latest comment: 3 months ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Asiatyrannus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 04:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Asiatyrannus is thought to have grown to less than half the size of other tyrannosaurs?
- Source: [1]
nominated by LittleLazyLass (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.
LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 07:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC).
- Starting Review--Kevmin § 19:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough. Article writer should be tagged in nomination. Article well cited and sources are reliable, no close paraphrasing identified, with specific name groups/tachnical phrases noted and ignored. Hook verified and cited in article. QPQ done.--Kevmin § 19:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- @LittleLazyLass: Please address the above. Z1720 (talk) 00:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Zheng, Wenjie; Jin, Xingsheng; Xie, Junfang; Du, Tianming (2024-07-25). "The first deep-snouted tyrannosaur from Upper Cretaceous Ganzhou City of southeastern China". Scientific Reports. 14 (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66278-5. ISSN 2045-2322.
- Does that address it? LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 22:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
due to lack of response from nominator.--Kevmin § 16:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
I do not think that forgetting to credit the original author is a disqualifying issue, especially if it was a good faith mistake. If worst came to worst it could have been fixed in prep. Still needs a final check. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- It actually is a disqualifying issue, as all major contributors are to be mentioned in the nomination, and in this case the nominator did not do any of the writing, so it was credited wrong. Additionally response time is a perennial issue raised on the project page. But we got there in the end.
Article still meeting all checked DYK criteria, not changes to article in the intervening time. Alt0 is ready to go.--Kevmin § 17:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
