Talk:Asilomar State Beach

Public domain text

The original of this article came from the public domain site at http://www.parks.ca.gov/default.asp?page_id=566.

This article is very un-encyclopedic

While I appreciate finding information about Asilomar, this article does not conform to the model that encyclopedia entries should follow.

If all of the information came from a certain web page, then maybe this entry should be reduced to a stub with a link to that page?

Assessment

ive cleaned up the tone some and it still needs work but at least can qualify as as start class article now. Anlace 03:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Probably copyright violation, delete the article suggested

Despite cleanup, the article cites no sources. Above is mentioned the one original source for the article with assertion that it is a public domain source. However, a California state website is not a Federal website which would be public domain. I suggest the article is best deleted, and leave room for new editors to start over. I am marking it with "copyvio" tag now, assuming it still includes copied material from the source that is not in fact public domain. Even if it does not, the article is best deleted. doncram (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

i withdraw copyright vio tag, as i don't care to investigate this properly. Have created a separate article on Asilomar Conference Grounds, which is a National Historic Landmark, and deleted section on it from this article on the state beach. doncram (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asilomar State Beach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113165452/http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/ccmpas_guide.pdf to http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/ccmpas_guide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Changing importance to mid

Updating importance of article from "low" to "mid" (as per Wikipedia:WikiProject_California/Assessment#Importance_scale - "Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area." state beaches qualify as notable protected areas, and notable in their particular geographic location.) -- Charlesreid1 (talk) 14:59, 4 July 2022 (UTC)