Talk:Aslan Abashidze

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Otr500 in topic Article issues and classification

Additional Sources needed

edit

This article needs additional sources. So far the only cite that backs up this article is this which isn't a reliable source. This article is not in line with WP:BLP but I'm not stubbing it at this point much of the information in the article may have been available in the dead links. If restoring them please add them as inline citations. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The site you claim to be "unreliable" is run by Louisiana State University-based scholar Alexander Mikaberidze and the Advisory Board includes such prominent students of the Caucasus as Gocha Japaridze, Stephen H. Rapp and Ronald Grigor Suny.[1] --KoberTalk 05:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
You may want to comment here. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aslan Abashidze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aslan Abashidze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article issues and classification

edit
The criteria #1 states; The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited and #4, The article is reasonably well-written.
The article has a January 2010 "More footnotes" and August 2020 inline "citation needed" tags. Reassess to C-class.
edit
There are six entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion and any "extras" need trimming.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply