Talk:Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo

Authors of the declaration of independence

The note currently says that: "The Assembly of Kosovo declared its independence on 17 February 2008" The question of which the Authors of the declaration of independence (the "Declaration") is a matter of dispute.

The authors of the declaration clearly state that the are “We, the democratically elected leaders of our people...” http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7249677.stm (about half way down.)

Serbia always maintained that it was the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government, which being provisional, could not legally adopt any permanent declaration of independence.

In the judgement of the International Court of Justice, the “the authors of the declaration of independence of 17 February 2008 did not act as one of the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government within the Constitutional Framework, but rather as persons who acted together in their capacity as representatives of the people of Kosovo outside the framework of the interim administration.” http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/16010.pdf Section 2(a) The identity of the authors of the declaration of independence - Pages 11 & 12.

Saying that the authors were “the democratically elected leaders of [the] people [of Kosovo]”could be pro-independence POV, even though it is factually correct, per the ICJ Judgement.

Saying that the authors were “the The Assembly of Kosovo” (which is one of Provisional Institutions of Self-Government) is pro Serbia POV.

Saying that the authors are “persons who acted together in their capacity as representatives of the people of Kosovo” is neutral POV (Coming from the judgement of the International Court of Justice, however it is a mouthful to say).

I think the best neural POV solution is not to mention who the authors are. 2007apm (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I have edited the article International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence to reflect this. I did so by stating the declaration was "adopted at a meeting of the Assembly", which I think is neutral and reflects the facts.--Rallette (talk) 09:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

See related discussion here. Japinderum (talk) 14:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

PISG Assembly and RoK Assembly

Related to these questions. Since UNSCR1244 and UNMIK are still de-jure in force - what is the current relation between the PISG Assembly and the RoK Assembly and what was the process of succession/transformation for all PISG institutions into RoK institutions? What is the UNMIK position over RoK and its institutions actions after the declaration of independence? Alinor (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Assembly of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5rRB9e3bz?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.icj-cij.org%2Fdocket%2Ffiles%2F141%2F15987.pdf to http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/15987.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230123314/http://www.unmikonline.org/constframework.htm to http://www.unmikonline.org/constframework.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Naming/moves.

Iaof2017, I have reverted your changes here and to Assembly of Kosovo as you cannot perform a move like that. Please see WP:MOVE. Step one would be discussion on this page and then go from there. That said, I also find the original moves by Dardn2015 baffling, since the correct WP:COMMONNAME is the Assembly of Kosovo. Fixing things so that this article is at Assembly of Kosovo would require a technical move at WP:RM. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 07:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 15 September 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved  — Amakuru (talk) 13:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

---

• Parliament Assembly of Kosovo → Assembly of Kosovo

– Revert move to WP:COMMONNAME ref official site, etc ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

ping @Iaof2017, Dardn2015, Eurovision 14, and Hakuli: ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

• Support per WP:COMMONNAME ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
• Support - When I did a search for Assembly of Kosovo, I could not find any results in the first two pages of Google Search results which had "Parliament" before it. Thus, to best follow WP:COMMONNAME, we should remove "Parliament" from the title. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 21:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Alternativa

What's the source for Alternativa having one seat? I couldn't find a source anywhere.--Aréat (talk) 07:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)