Talk:Assistive Technology Industry Association

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

NPOV and potential conflict of interest: I am a software developer who develops assistive technology. I am also a member of the Assistive Technology Industry Association. I do believe, however, that for this article I have maintained a neutral point of view and focused on facts backed up with references. For people with disabilities and their families, reliable information is often hard to find, and often fragmented. This article tries not only to provide neutral information about one of the organizations in the disability field, but also to provide information (and links) about how it relates to other disability organizations. Ben Slotznick (talk) 04:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Made style of citing sources more consistent: Hope this addresses the comment to the article concerning citation. Ben Slotznick (talk) 14:06, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

See WP:CITE; citations should be inline with what they refer to, not a general bibliography. tedder (talk) 14:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Deleted general references that are not used as an inline citiation, but kept the short form citation for notes, because one reference is used at two different places. Hope this addresses your comment. The remaining section titled "bibliography" contains works produced or published by ATIA, rather than references to it. Should I change the title to that section? Ben Slotznick (talk) 15:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Renamed section from "Bibliography" to "Publications" and moved it below references just above External Links. These publications are mentioned in the article (one previously, the other mention just added). This section has external links to the publications. The intent of the renaming and the move is to make it clearer that these are not references for the article, and to make their external links near other external links. Is this OK? Or should the section be named Publication List? Or should these two publications with their links just be moved to the External Link section? Ben Slotznick (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Assistive Technology Industry Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply