Talk:Association Montessori International of the United States

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Non neutral "United-States -ification" of the AMI

edit

For whatever reason, this article is entitled AMIUSA, but much of the content is related to the "original" international AMI, which is not USA -centric! I propose to either:

  • Rename this article as Association Montessori Internationale, with a section of it referring to the AMIUSA
  • Create a new Association Montessori Internationale article, while deleting the content from the present article which is related to the "original" AMI

Any suggestions?

--MarmotteiNoZ 02:27, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Association Montessori International of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply