Talk:Association for Asian Performance

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Association for Asian Performance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314144624/https://s3.amazonaws.com/os_uploads/152111_2.4.pdf to https://s3.amazonaws.com/os_uploads/152111_2.4.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

As of October 11, 2021, I will be revamping this article with new, notable sources since it has gone through many iterations and deletions over the years. Stay tuned this fall for a more thorough and detailed article. Camargue19 (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Notability

@Camargue19: Are you running into the same issues I did when I searched before PRODding? There's not a lot of secondary sourcing available, unfortunately. Not sure we need a membership/board section either, unfortunately. It doesn't seem encyclopedic. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 21:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: Hi there. I feel that there are enough resources pulled from the JSTOR academic journals that the rest of the article is satisfactorily notable enough - however I do agree with you for deleting the membership/board section. Do you have other notable articles that you might suggest? --Camargue19 (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

@Camargue19, I'll see if I can find some good examples of organizations where the articles have fleshed out the why. Star Mississippi 04:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi Thank you for working on that! I should clarify - do you know of additional articles that could serve as additional secondary sourcing to support this page? A peer-reviewed article, perhaps? --Camargue19 (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)